Why is Mickey 17 instead of 7?

22 views

In Bong Joon Hos sci-fi epic, Mickey 17, the protagonists numerical designation signifies the countless times he has perished on his perilous mission. Each cloned iteration bears the weight of its predecessors sacrifices, a poignant testament to the indomitable spirit of Mickey 17.

Comments 0 like

Beyond Lucky Number Seven: Why Mickey is 17, Not Just Mickey

Bong Joon-ho’s upcoming sci-fi film, Mickey 17, has already sparked intrigue, not just for its director and source material (Edward Ashton’s novel Mickey7), but also for the protagonist’s rather specific designation. Why Mickey 17, and not, say, a more statistically appealing Mickey 7, or even a Mickey 13 for some added bad luck? The answer, rooted in the core concept of the story, lies in the brutal reality of Mickey’s role as an “Expendable.”

The film, like the book, explores the chilling premise of a disposable employee sent on the most dangerous missions in the harsh, unforgiving frontier of space colonization. Mickey is effectively a prototype, a guinea pig whose life is deemed less valuable than the overall mission’s success. Whenever Mickey dies – and he does, frequently – a new clone is grown, inheriting the memories and experiences of its predecessor. This “reincarnation” offers a unique advantage: learned lessons from past failures are incorporated into each subsequent iteration.

This is where the number 17 becomes significant. It isn’t about superstition or a random choice; it’s a numerical marker of Mickey’s numerous deaths and resurrections. Mickey 17 isn’t just another clone; he is the culmination of sixteen previous lives, each ending in some often gruesome and likely informative manner.

Imagine the baggage Mickey 17 carries. He’s not merely a fresh start; he’s a living library of past mistakes. He knows what alien flora is poisonous, which cave systems are structurally unsound, and what tactical blunders to avoid. The number “17” is a grim reminder of the cost of this knowledge, a visual representation of the sacrifices already made.

Choosing a lower number like 7 would diminish this impact. It would suggest a less arduous journey, a less significant degree of hardship endured. Mickey 17, on the other hand, immediately conveys a sense of accumulated trauma, a long and painful history etched into his very designation.

Ultimately, the numerical designation of Mickey 17 serves as a crucial storytelling device. It’s a subtle yet powerful way to communicate the stakes of the narrative and the expendable nature of the protagonist’s existence. It’s a promise of perilous adventures, repeated failures, and the heavy burden of accumulated experience, all wrapped up in a single, compelling number. As we eagerly anticipate Bong Joon-ho’s adaptation, the seemingly simple detail of “Mickey 17” hints at a deeply layered and emotionally resonant story about sacrifice, resilience, and the enduring spirit of a man who has died, and learned, countless times.